Anti-Semitism Versus Anti-Israeli Sentiment

Adults from four religious/ethnic groupings: Arab Muslim, Arab Christian, Non-Arab Muslim, and North American Christian were administered measures of anti-Semitism and anti-Israeli sentiment to determine if the concepts were related. Correlation strength was r=.61, and anti-Semitism remained even when the effects of anti-Israeli sentiment were parceled out. The reasons for such differences are the basis of discussion and further inquiry. Introduction [1] Conor Cruise O’Brien observed that anti-Semitism was a very light sleeper, though since September 2001 it has been something of an insomniac (Runnymede Commission: 17). Perhaps a misnomer since the old anti-Semitism never quite disappeared, the new antiSemitism incorporates labor, NGOs, and those on the political left. The new anti-Semitism is decidedly anti-Israeli. Largely underreported, anti-Semitic hate crimes throughout Europe are thought to be the work of young Muslim males with pro-Palestinian leanings (EUMC; Human Rights First). [2] Criticisms of Israeli policy toward the Palestinians have met with charges of antiSemitism – some fairly and some unfairly – but the linkage of the stereotypical Jew and Israeli policy toward the Palestinians has become prominent. For instance, criticism of Israel is rarely devoid of anti-Semitic metaphors. One needs only to look at the barrage of antiSemitic anti-Israeli cartoons in mainstream Arab news sources as well as some mainstream Western newspapers, e.g. La Stampa, The Independent. [3] Anti-Semitism disguised as criticism of Israel is not unknown. Wire services transfer the bias report to other newspapers creating at times intentional media distortion as the inflated casualties at Jenin attest (HonestReporting). The Bonn based watchdog group Media Tenor has found the BBC’s Middle East coverage was 85 percent negative, 15 percent neutral, and Anti-Semitism Versus Anti-Israeli Sentiment Journal of Religion & Society 2 9 (2007) 0 percent positive toward Israel (Fleischer). Not surprisingly a recent Versailles court decision cited three journalists for racism when the popular newspaper La Monde printed their 2002 article entitled, “Israel-Palestine: The Cancer” (Gross). [4] The linkage between anti-Semitism and an anti-Israeli bias may be noticeable in these cases of impartiality, but it is not limited to such media bias. There is over-sanctioning of Israel by the United Nations compared to other nations, e.g., 101 UN resolutions for the Palestinians and none for the same Jews ejected from Arab lands (see forgottenrefugees.com). There are notions of Israel as illegitimate with calls for genocide by Muslim heads of State and Holocaust denial conferences. There is the court of public opinion, which has ranked Israel the least liked of all nations (BBC News), as well as proposed boycotts of Israeli academics by the teacher’s and trade unions in England and one Canadian province (Ontario), as well as a boycott and censure proposed by the Anglican Church. More to the point, with the exception of United States, anti-Semitic attacks have doubled globally primarily as a function of what is called the new anti-Semitism (U.S. Dept. of State; Wistrich). [5] While anti-Semites are likely to be anti-Israeli, the reverse may not be true. Critics of Israel may not be anti-Semitic, as one French survey suggested (Mayer). However, a major European study has found just the opposite: statistically those who endorse anti-Israeli statements tend to endorse anti-Semitic statements (Kaplan and Small). A recent survey as well reports that about a third of Europeans believe that violence against Jews is directly due to anti-Israeli sentiment (ADL). [6] If disdain of Israel was unrelated to anti-Semitism, then it seems unlikely that global antiSemitic attacks on Jews and their property would have doubled. If Israeli disdain was unrelated to anti-Semitism, how can the high “unfavorable” rating of Jews in Muslim nations where few or not Jews reside be explained (Pew Global Attitudes)? If anti-Israeli sentiment and anti-Semitic belief were not fused, then there would have been no historical precedent of Jews being murdered in the Middle East prior to the birth of the State of Israel, but there has been hundreds of incidents resulting in thousands of deaths in the last millennia (Gilbert). [7] Until recently, anti-Semitism and anti-Israeli attitudes has not been researched in an Arab or Muslim population (Gallup; cf., Frindte et al; Kaplan and Small) and the effects of culture have not been examined independently from the effects of religion as a source of antiSemitism. The two religions that have traditionally fostered anti-Semitic beliefs are Christianity and Islam. To that end, four distinct groups separating out the effects of culture from religion will be examined. Method [8] Respondents were obtained from a large Midwest American city and nearby middle-size Canadian city. All respondents were selected through a series of friendship networks. Interview schedules were administered to English speaking respondents. Two Arabic interpreters administered the same interview schedule translated backward and forward to Arabic Christian and Muslim respondents. The anonymity of responses was assured and 1520 minutes was the approximate response time for all applicants to complete the measures. Anti-Semitism Versus Anti-Israeli Sentiment Journal of Religion & Society 3 9 (2007) [9] A total of 194 subjects participated in this study. The total mean age of the sample was 36-years old with four years of college education, approximately equally male and female, mostly married and of middle income. In terms of demographics, the Arab Muslims had a mean age of 33 years, predominately female (69%), married (75%), less educated (some college; 3.7 years) with less than one-third identifying as low income, and residing in North America for an average of 6.4 years. By contrast, Arab Christians, of mostly Lebanese descent, had a mean age of 40, were better educated (college; 4.7 years), mostly female (65%), slightly more than half married (57%), with 10% identifying themselves as lower income and residing in North America for 9.2 years. Non-Arab Muslims were mostly of Bosnian descent and had a mean age of 35. Education was some college (4.0 years), mostly male (52%), married (64%), with 29% identifying with lower income, and residing in North America for 6.1 years. Non-Arab Christians were 36 years old, educated with college (4.0 years), predominately more female (64%), less married (29%), of less income (35% identifying as lower income), and residing in North America all their lives. With respect to anti-Semitism, there was no statistical difference in Shia and Sunni identity (p 0.20) partial η=0.01, both Religion and Ethnicity main effects did remain significant (Religion: F (1,134) = 12.88, p < 0.001, partial η = 0.09; Ethnicity: F (1,134) = 74.05, p < 0.001, partial η = 0.36). Muslims scored higher than Christians on antiSemitism even when scores on anti-Israeli sentiment were similar. Along those lines, Arabs scored higher than non-Arabs on anti-Semitism after adjusting for anti-Israeli sentiment. Discussion [17] In regard to the question of whether there is a difference between anti-Semitism and anti-Israeli sentiment, the answer, at least statistically, is no. Consistent with the findings in a large European study (Kaplan and Small) anti-Semitism is moderately associated with antiIsraeli sentiment and anti-Israeli sentiment is moderately associated with anti-Semitism. Even when the effects of anti-Israel sentiment are statistically controlled, anti-Semitism persists. [18] The significant relationship between anti-Israeli sentiment and anti-Semitism does not imply that criticism of Israeli policies dealing with the Palestinian people is anti-Semitic. In Israel, where four-fifths of the population is Jewish, Jews regularly and vigorously debate their government policies regarding Palestinian issues. [19] Yet, when anti-Israeli sentiment includes metaphors that employ traditional anti-Semitic canards, when anti-Israeli rhetoric mimics pro-Arab rhetoric, when attacks on Jews around the world have doubled, and when the levels of discourse include calling for the dismantling of the State of Israel and the genocide of its people, then it is not surprising that this study and others have found high statistical correlation between anti-Israeli sentiment and antiSemitism. [20] Specific to this study, some group differences were surprising, while other findings could have been more anticipated. Perhaps not surprising was that Christians who resided in North American all their lives consistently held the lowest scores for any anti-Semitic or anti-Israeli beliefs. [21] It may not be surprising either that recent Arab immigrants from the Middle East would be more anti-Semitic and more anti-Israeli. But why should Non-Arab Muslims – those from Bosnia and Pakistan also be anti-Semitic and anti-Israeli? These Muslims have little in common geographically and even less in common ethnically, but share the same religion – Islam. While other factors may be involved, Islam infused with anti-Semitism and anti-Israeli sentiment, appears as key to Muslim identity. Researchers are just beginning to grapple with the subtleties of Arab and Muslim identity (Saroglou and Galand) and future researchers may Anti-Semitism Versus Anti-Israeli Sentiment Journal of Religion & Society 6 9 (2007) wish to examine the salience of anti-Semitism and anti-Israeli sentiment as a threat to identity coherence. [22] The results of this study address the larger problem regarding the acquisition of “everyday racism” (Essed) – how widespread culturally accepted beliefs are communicated within and between groups. It begs the question as well of those who are religious or nationalistic as compared to say those who are not religious or nationalistic, and future researchers may wish to examine the within-group differences. It is incumbent upon researchers to explore if one can be a “good Muslim” without being anti-Israeli or antiSemitic, which begs the question of the stauration point – the point where public opinion moves from anti-Semitic beliefs to calls for genocide (Baum 2008). [23] Do people become overly identified with their religious or ethnic group in the course of assuming a social identity? Or, is anti-Semitism and anti-Israeli sentiment so saturated in the cultural air that it is accepted? (Harrison). Is anti-Semitism based on anger and hate? Or, is anti-Semitism based on fear and ignorance due to long held tales and myths of “The Jews”? (Baum, in press). [24] Do such questions even matter if everyone around them holds similar thoughts. One interviewee’s experience was telling. Mohammed, age 37 is a Pakistani Muslim, a father of three with an advanced degree. His manner was gentle and mild. Yet, he endorsed several anti-Semitic and anti-Israeli responses. When asked how he knew that “Jews were evil” and that “world terrorism would cease if America stopped supporting Israel,” he replied, “everybody knows.” For Mohammed, social truth was established by like-minded friends, his cleric, and the imagined community of Arab satellite television. [25] Researchers as well may wish to examine why North American Christians have lower levels of anti-Semitism? Has years of Christian-Jewish dialogue been effective in reducing anti-Semitism? Has direct contact with Jews and Christians lowered anti-Semitism levels? If any of these concerns are true, then the next steps may include dialoguing with the Muslim community. Though, the real answers to these questions and their solutions are the domain of future researchers. AcknowledgementPortions of the paper were presented at the Seventh Biennial Meeting of the InternationalAssociation of Genocide Scholars, Sarajevo, July 9, 2007. The authors would like to thankDennis Jackson, University of Windsor, for his statistical assistance and Sid Bokolsky,University of Michigan-Dearborn, for his assistance with the student pool.